103. OG9 (Philosophy)( P7 K) S( ]3 _3 u
开始听写在:2008-5-26 下午 08:01:32
2 [% R5 l: Z( r9 h. T8 y5 i2 k7 P' K' ~Listen to part of a lecture in philosophy class, the professor (has been) talking about ethics, okay, if we are going to (discuss) goodness and justice
" ^; D7 C$ n. I# D8 J{n.正义,公正,公平}, what makes an individual good or a society just or virtuous{a.善良的,有道德的}, then we need to start with (the) ancient Greeks, so we’ll start with Plato, Plato’s philosophy, now, some of you may have studied Plato’s philosophy in some other course, so this might be easy, okay, at the risk of boring you, let me give you just an over view of Plato’s ethical theory, Plato says the soul has, and by soul he simply means that which animates{a.有活力的;有生气的} the body, (gives its life), any way, he says that the soul has three separate parts, called, um, faculties{n.才能,能力}, which I’ll come back to, he believed that goodness in an individual was to be found when the three parts of (the) soul worked together, when they (weren’t) in conflict, but existed in harmony, a good or just person, will have a soul in which the three faculties work well together, so how does he arrive that analysis, well, he starts out (in) his very famous work, the republic, um, he starts (out) by saying it’s very difficult to get a (grasp on what) the individual’s soul looks like, so, to get some idea (of) what the individual human soul like, he says we should study the structure of society, what kinds of people and activities every society has to have, he argues that every society (has to) have three groups of people, workers soldiers, and leaders, and each has a sort of defining characteristic, every society has to have workers like farmers or, people works in factories, producing (all the) things that we need for everyday life, (and) according to Plato, the key feature of workers is that they’re focused on their own desires or appetites, interested in satisfying the needs of the body, so workers are associated with desire, okay, now if you live in a society that has a good amount of wealth, good agriculture, good industry, other societies are probably (going) to try to take it, so you need a class of soldiers, who (are) supposed to protect the state from external threats, well, these soldiers, well, they are going to be in dangerous situations quiet frequently, so you need people with, um, a lot of high spirits, an emotional type of individual, emotion is what characterizes in this group, and then, Plato says, the third group you need is leaders, their main role (will) be to think rationally, to use their (reason or) intellect to make decisions, as decision makers, leaders determine what the states is to do, how the affairs of1 n! h+ r# e& v. o! ^& b
citizens are to be run, Plato then asks himself, okay, (assume) we’ve got such a society with these three groups, when (will) the society be a good, um, a just society, well, you can only have a good society when its three parts are working well together, each doing its proper thing, and Plato believes (this can only) happen if workers and soldiers learn moderation or self-control, but why, why do workers and soldiers have to learn self-control, well, (how) can a society flourish if the workers and soldiers don’t control their desires and emotions, Plato (thinks it) if they aren’t under control, workers will sleep too much and play too much, so they aren’t (going) to get their jobs done, and soldiers need to channel their high spiritedness in a certain direction, precisely by being (courageous), but you aren’t get their automatically, you need to teach them this kind of moderation, so you need an educational system that first of all we’ll train the leaders, so that they’ll make good decisions, so they’ll know what (is wise), then make leaders responsible, um, turn over to them the education (of) the other two groups, and through education, build (a) society so that (the) workers and soldiers learn to use their intellect to control their desires and emotions, if you had all that, then, for Plato, you’d have a good or just society, now take that picture, that’s social, political picture, and apply (it) to the individual person, you remember about the soul, that (it) consists of three parts, or faculties? Can you guess what they are, desires, emotions, and intellect, the characteristics resist associated with the three group of society, and can you guess how Plato define a good or just person, well, it is <parallel> to how we characteristics a good or just society, the three parts have to be in harmony, in each of us, our desires and emotions often get (the) better of us, and lead us to de foolish things, they’re in conflict with the intellect, so to get them to all work together, to co-exist in harmony, every person needs to (be) shaped in the same way (what) we’ve shaped the society-through the educational system, individuals must (be educated) to use their intellect to control their emotions and desires, that’s harmony in the soul.: L1 V( ~" C2 l1 Z) Z
以上听写编辑在:2008-5-26 下午 09:07:32
7 s J' d. Z4 t8 ~) M; d/ y听写结束。共录入 1句, 815英文单词。6 `4 I1 L& N; i
开始时间为:2008-5-26 下午 08:01:32,结束时间为: 2008-5-26 下午 09:07:33,共用时! i1 G; O$ M* r* Z4 ]1 `
66分钟。平均 12.3484848484848词每分钟。/ P9 I5 U* G' x6 B# E( e
3 \" `, H* i) p( O8 }0 }0 ^听写前笔记:philosophy, Platto/ boring/ overview/ by soul, facuties, individual/ hamony/ good, just/ 3 work toge(together)/ public, indi/ society/ worker, farmer, factory, own desire/ soldiers/ leader/ good, wealth/ other taken/ soldr(soldier); h% E: ]5 y& m" _$ s
防take/ high-spirit/ emotional/ l(leader):make decision/ state to do/ how to be run, got such/ 3 group/ good, just, part/ each proper/ w&s/ moderation/ self control/ flourish/ control does/ sleeps/ teach/ kind moderate/ need edu./ make leader/ responsible/ use intellect/ to control/ good, just/ social political/ soul desire/ emotions, intellecture/ how chara(charactize)/ d&e, better, foolish/ coexistence harmony/ through edu/ control/ harmony in soul# N0 e- g) X' h: D4 g9 o
" t5 A. x% p, ^; |4 |
( f2 C$ E2 w q( J& Q
听写后笔记:philo/ ethics/ goodness, justice/ ancient Gks(Greeks)/ Plato/ easy/ overview theory/ soul/ animate of body/ faculty/ 3 part together/ good, just/ 3 work well together/ diffc(difficulty)/to get indi(individual)/ society/ every/ 3 group/ worker farmer, factory, desire of body/ soldier/ leader/ wealth, agr(agriculture), ind(industry)/ other want take/ need soldier/ high spirit/ emotion/ leader/ reason/ state to do/ as soon got such society/ good society/ each proper/ moderation, self-control/ if don’t/ how/ sleep, play/ work not done/ edu:train leader/ responsible/ edu –另两个/ work, s(soldier)/ interl(intellect)/ control/ picture/ individual/ soul/ 3 part/ faculty/ desire/ emo./ intel./ in harmony/ better of us/ get to all work/ together/ shape=sh. of society6 j- ] x0 u- f9 A& ]1 r2 `3 Y
' ^7 O! O6 t5 s3 L
: h8 @' c/ B9 B我是竖行记的,0 }& W0 e q! e+ r1 p8 C
信纸横记,
# w0 X- {) y: M5 p$ A四竖行,
3 L% r& @; `6 U4 ]“/”表示一行内容,& ~0 t# G* B% q0 X
下划线是写错词或内容
; i: X8 E9 p( B4 _. I; |不会用缩写,傻记,没很清条理,愁ing9 }7 r7 ~( [& X4 r
3 W% j9 `2 v% E+ w" R104. 0308 (Psychology)$ e" z- U3 F' J2 n7 Z% H
开始听写在:2008-5-28 上午 12:42:496 f) e y' J7 w- d5 u
listen to part of a lecture in psychology class, in order to diagnose and treat abnormal behavior, we have to start with clear definitions what is meant by abnormal and normal, (criteria {n.标准}) must be worked out for distinguishing one from the other actual clinical cases, the word abnormal implies the (deviation{n.背离;偏差}) of some clearly defined norm, in the case of physical illness, the boundary line between (normality{n.常态}and pathology{n.病状;病变}) are often (clearly delineated{ v.描绘...的轮廓,描写,描绘}) by medical science, making it easier to diagnose, on the psychological lever, however, we have no ideal model to use as (a base) of comparison, nothing to help us to distinguish mental health from mental disorder, the problem (of) defining abnormal behavior (via) establishing
3 V& S5 `, s& x: o- M2 fjust what is meant by normal behavior has (proved) extremely difficult, however, (as chapter five) outlines several criteria have been proposed, one norm (described in) detail in your text is personal adjustment, and individual who (was) able (to) deal with problems to effectively (without) serious anxiety or unhappiness or more serious (symptoms) is (said) to be well-adjusted, personal adjustment as (a) norm has several serious limitations though, for example, it makes no reference to (the) individual’s (role) in the group, how (are) we (going to) classify, for example, a typical politician or business person who engages unethical (practice), either might be a successful, (happy), well-adjust individual, obviously, the (welfare{ n.福利,幸福,安宁}) of the group, as well as the individual, must be considered, which brings me to the next approach.# {- N' K7 h& d: q v
以上听写编辑在:2008-5-28 上午 01:09:13
* C0 E, T, j! o+ r$ l$ h' [- X听写结束。共录入 1句, 239英文单词。6 M2 q9 |1 _# v9 |
开始时间为:2008-5-28 上午 12:42:49,结束时间为: 2008-5-28 上午 01:09:14,共用时
[2 R ~7 P! F27分钟。平均 8.85185185185185词每分钟。" h4 K! {* _& c" r6 _) n# M" t
! o+ U7 R! T$ \4 e" R, t& C/ t8 z, }
: q2 J+ Z- _- B6 P" i3 G f
6 q+ G( e$ F, U* v4 t[ 本帖最后由 eagledoudou 于 2008-5-28 20:20 编辑 ]