看了第一页，再看最后一页。你进步超大哦。厉害。

但是做不对题

达达~~~进步很明显的说~~~我什么时候才能黑起来~~呜呜呜

引用:

原帖由 棉花糖落落 于 2008-7-24 13:18 发表 ( M0 T! S, Q# Q+ c# r: w: U+ p
达达~~~进步很明显的说~~~我什么时候才能黑起来~~呜呜呜

我还是做不对题！！！

语言学 3
# f. K( \8 d6 o5 \/ G     You’ll recall that in last week’s classes I talked about how the sounds made by most animals though sometimes complex are different from human language. Only in humans
8 _$ n+ V% D3 q3 fdo these sounds represent描绘, 表现; 表示; 象征; 作为...的代表objects and events  keep in mind that most animals can only repeat limited utterances 说话, 说话的方式, 发表#意见; 发表; 说话 over and over again. While, humans can say things that have never been says before. Today I wand to focus on human language and how it developed .& [: p- ]" f+ {% w) y, |+ h7 }
. [- n7 {- C5 r& B. V0 `9 O* M

     I doubt your surprised when I say that the evolution of language was slow and laborious费力的, 吃力的; 牵强的; 勤勉的; 生硬的 .There are some reliable evidence that language began with early humans a million and in half years ago. Though the study of the size and shape of brain fossils , scientists have determined that early human brains, like modern brains, had a left hemisphere半球, 大脑半球, 地球的半面slightly larger than the right hemisphere. We know that in modern humans the left hemisphere the seat of language . We also know that early human brains had a well developed frontal前面的, 额的, 正面的 section , known as Broca's area, which coordinates  调整; 整理; 协调一致the muscles使劲行进of the mouth and throat咽喉, 喉咙;.

- H8 B) q( p0 k, |

0 W0 O& c- |! T$ ~- ]

     It’s clearly then, that early humans had a speech apparatus仪器, 器械; 器官. They could produce any sound that we can. What we don't know is whether early humans used what they had. Since scholars学者; 古典学者know virtually nothing about prehistoric有文字记载的历史以前的, 史前的; 完全过时的, 旧式的; 非常古老的speech patterns, all they can do is speculate深思, 投机, 推测; 推测, 推断about how language actually originated. Let me give you a brief summary of some of these theories.

- ~* x  p5 P; X& W$ Q4 a, V

; u* H) P6 N# g4 e, ]' P[ 本帖最后由 达达摩摩 于 2008-7-24 14:24 编辑 ]

众人所说的简单的OG，我阅读连着2，3两篇全是错6个 完完全全无语了！！！
, F& \" g) A4 I7 ?, h) G1 I文章我完完全全读懂，就是做题不对！！！6个呀！！！( @0 z- i5 |% V( R
我从来在学习上没哭过，刚刚哭了......! O- k$ W- _- {3 k
。。。。。。

呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜呜........

达达不哭~~~~达达加油~~~老杜的音频听了么？？

人体生理心理类 1/ j- v  v  U! F& o6 E4 o
. X) x. n8 u7 r( V' b& H0 n% O+ @  f
Baby hypothesis- a. S# X; B7 T  m

       In our lab today, we'll be testing the hypothesis假设 that babied can count as early as five months of age. The six babies here are all less than six months old. You'll be watching them on closed-circuit绕...环行; 环行, 绕行 TV and measuring their responses.
7 w& ^* k1 _: f

- t: E, p9 a2 r

      The experiment is based on the well-established observation that babies stare凝视, 注视; 瞪眼 longer if they don't see what they expect to see. First, we're going to let two dolls move slowly in front of the babies.

# n5 n' X# X* M  U" t" w     The babies will see the two dolls disappear behind a screen  屏, 银幕, 幕. Your job is to record, in seconds, how long the babies stare at the dolls when the screen is removed.

( n" s! o1 n2 z8 K# I. P: o
/ V) r$ I2 M! B) J6 z# n( ^

      In the next stage, two dolls will again move in front of the babies and disappear. But then a third doll will follow. When the screen is removed, the babies will only see two dolls. If we're right, the babies will now stare longer because they expect three dolls but only see two.

; }+ C8 L4 N8 d3 g0 ^& N0 r! G4 t8 H: B) Z; q' z4 F

     It seems remarkable to think that such young children can count. My own research has convinced 说服, 使相信 me that they have this ability from birth. But whether they do or not, perhaps we should raise another question --- should we take advantage of this ability by teaching children mathematics at such a young age? They have great untapped塞子未开的, 未使用的 potential, but is it good for parents to pressure young children.

这篇很难呀！！！我有的句子听上来20遍才记下来 不过我觉得读的语调不舒服，有点怪% V- t) ^4 l4 {9 M, ?2 D% h$ H

# _, d  v1 {! ^$ u[ 本帖最后由 达达摩摩 于 2008-7-25 17:43 编辑 ]

但是红的好少………………