参考了好多东西，包括李笑来的185篇。由于我自己是属于作文完全不行的人，六级写作只37分。所以觉得现在写的东西很肤浅，也许结构也不对，也许说话也颠三倒四。) P, F `& @# w/ R/ v) H7 k0 o
不过既然都有勇气贴出来了，就希望大家都多多的给与意见吧。
7 _8 W0 u* h5 Q4 c! e+ m9 f如何提高呢？我还是很迷惑……
5 z% P3 G+ v: U9 o$ o3 A6 u* m/ m6 d/ y + Z) i1 Q- M. A3 v2 n* L) q3 V
. E8 f! h& z3 Q' W% N% w4 h q2 F6 w; |/ CIf you were an employer, which kind of worker would you prefer to hire: an inexperienced worker at a lower salary or an experienced worker at a higher salary? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer./ q# D% b: K8 O' D. K3 C
8 r3 G$ G2 q5 o* D2 h 6 d+ Y$ t" n1 Z1 `( R1 e
Every year numerous people run to the labor market to find a job, and they can be approximately devided into two types: inexperienced but a lower salary and experienced but a higher salary. Some company consider that experienced workers can bring them higher profit. While others might choose inexperienced workers by the reason of lower cost. From my perspective, I agree with the latter idea. Hiring an inexperienced worker is not only a meaning of lower cost, but can bring a skilled-in-future candidate to the group.
- s7 E: Z( a2 f$ o, q- f' z; LThe company will be better off choosing a employee with less experience, because this worker command a lower salary, which means that the company can decrease its operating cost with a plus labor, and this employee has strongly intent to do the best, he must work hard. As a statistic about the condition of employment has shown, above 73 percent of the new member have a force to work deligent, especially those with less experience. Will you refuse a hard-working guy only because he is inexperienced? Hiring an unskilled person is very feasible even only considering the condition of cost-effective.0 P" v7 g3 {: R- `+ \) s* v. x
Moreover, lack of prior experience is not a fully bad thing. Oppositely, it will allow them to learn new procedures more quickly, as they will not have to unlearn old ones. Similiarly, employers often complain that seasoned workers have become rusky in their established routines. They lack of the initiative and drive in comparision with their youthful counterparts. Finally, creative positions are often filled with people who have little experience because these individuals are still open to new trends and movements, as oppose to being committed to old fads. They are worth being trained, and they are potential labor capital and finally can make great profit for the group.. z* E& n7 ]3 h( [, n* M2 V
The concern over the advantages of the skilled candidates, however, I believe, is not without reason. It is clear that some positions for which
7 p& m8 `. C* pextensive experience is absolutely necessary or at least helpful. For instance, an investment firm will not allow a recent college graduate to manage files of their most important clients. And an international company will not hire a inexperienced worker to be its CEO. In these area specialised knowledge gained from experience is compulsory. We can’t put the unskilled employee instead only concerning about the purpose of the profit maximization by cutting the cost down.
. F3 x9 }( W0 QFrom my point of view, if the aim of hiring is only to the fundamental operation, the advantages of choosing a less experienced guy carry more weight than those of choosing a more experienced person. So, in conclusion, if I am an employer, I prefer to hire a worker which is inexperienced but demands a lower salary.
