昨天听写2 场景上听写完毕,,,,,,,!!!!!庆祝下!!!!
' u" @& X8 D/ o3 y# h' Y2 Z词汇地理类
8 H; j. |$ ^* A! G5 M- i+ v R词频100 完结
N) [7 M" K1 @0 o综合写作1
) ~8 u1 x( a3 v$ ~$ y) `背段子4 Y5 V: Q, V2 s2 K1 ]
BARRON听力总结完毕/ ~2 y* T( T- g9 e/ _. s$ c9 L
口语摸班' y/ b1 d ]9 Y0 M2 Q! |$ Z; P* _
综合写作教程
( u Q/ Q# o& c% j& a0 h" \- `. F) _" b口语JJ
) f/ S6 h2 G9 U/ ^ T7 g& S! [' v
/ p7 K: v# h* m! N$ S5 L(二)阿波罗计划
5 j4 U$ B+ g& e6 H- m" x( N/ o1 {Some of you may familiar with Apollo program in geology study of the moon in 1960s. But you may not aware the expensive of research perceive(preceded) the study. The work of the too early researchers was very important in determining the nature surface of the moon. Back in 1892, a geologist, named Carl, was challenging the prevailing view of moon(about lunar) surface. At that time, most scientists thought the crater on moon are created by volcanic action. Do some careful telescopic studies, There are no spacecrafts back then, so the telescope were the best way to observe the moon. He concluded that the lunar crater uniform that have to be resolve the impact of falling bodies such as media right(meteorites). I point the enlargements pictures some of the drawings on the board, if you compare them to those in your text, you can see that his are amazingly accurate, still is comtemptory(contemporaries) rejected the work. Fifty years later, the graduate student reasserted species. He too met with resistance and he left the acadmetic to run his family who machine business. But he did not give up his research, he work along in his spare time, and eventually writer the book called “the face of the moon”. A young geologist to read was so inspired and he persuaded NASA to incorporate geology into mention. Well, the Apollo missions confirm the most of violent ideas. Which is astonishing, he was not a professional scientists.' s; T1 B: X' z/ z
% g( A; w6 u) k' E6 H
5 J, U2 L- f! ]% t- [(三)太空垃圾; M* O& ~, F5 M
This is have anything do with lecture, it is just what I am wondering. I am very glad to attend the (entertain) questions. But I want to know is with our space exploration, aren’t astronomers concern that will polluting space, space craft and satellite. That is an interesting question. Well, first of all, it is important to understand space exploration is not that presitin(pristine) as you think. More than thousand tons of debris add the atmosphere every a single day. What? The space craft leave that much garbage? No, but there are meteoroids entering our atmosphere almost consistently. You familiar with what the moon surface look like, right? We do not have those craters on earth, I do not understand. Remember, the moons lack of atmosphere means that even small asteroids make craters. But most of meteoroids hit the earth melt or break up in the air. Causing meteorites ? The strikes(streaks) of light we see are meteoroids breaking up, isn’t that yet? Yeah, and getting back to your question pollution. That is one way we could be deal with spacecraft. The truth is we do have a lot of orbiting debris and travel thousands of miles per hour. Really?0 [ s$ V0 _& d2 \ I7 O. r% x
I would not want to collide with anything goes that fast. It is really dangerous for spacecraft. The by simply send back to earth atmosphere. Oh, so the debriss is break up, thanks! z% O8 Y7 T0 k
% T5 B6 `3 }5 \; b# C( [% {
5 B9 A# l G4 J' K$ r
KEEP MOVING ON!!!!